<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Peebles Square Community Meeting Monday November 19</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.parkplaceblog.com/2007/11/peebles-square-community-meeting-monday-november-19/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.parkplaceblog.com/2007/11/peebles-square-community-meeting-monday-november-19/</link>
	<description>Offical Website of the Greater Park Place Neighborhood Association</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 20:04:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregg Pazak</title>
		<link>http://www.parkplaceblog.com/2007/11/peebles-square-community-meeting-monday-november-19/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregg Pazak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 01:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parkplaceblog.com/2007/11/08/peebles-square-community-meeting-monday-november-19/#comment-75</guid>
		<description>So the  consensus plan a local architect was commissioned to draw up- after meeting with over 40 people from the community and after several sessions, was all theater? I thought we already identified house prototypes that maintained the neighborhood character and materials? Was this just a waste of the people&#039;s time and taxpayer&#039;s money?

What part of consensus plan do they not understand?  So much time and money was already invested in Rothchild Architects, it is a shame that the developer should be allowed to go off and do what benefits them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the  consensus plan a local architect was commissioned to draw up- after meeting with over 40 people from the community and after several sessions, was all theater? I thought we already identified house prototypes that maintained the neighborhood character and materials? Was this just a waste of the people&#8217;s time and taxpayer&#8217;s money?</p>
<p>What part of consensus plan do they not understand?  So much time and money was already invested in Rothchild Architects, it is a shame that the developer should be allowed to go off and do what benefits them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John M.</title>
		<link>http://www.parkplaceblog.com/2007/11/peebles-square-community-meeting-monday-november-19/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>John M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 16:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parkplaceblog.com/2007/11/08/peebles-square-community-meeting-monday-november-19/#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Well I can certainly add my voice to this as a community member that I too am very concerned about this surprise turn of events. I had every expectation of the community being part of this process. If the county and Action Housing would include the community in these discussions, they might not be under the misinformation that you are standing alone on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I can certainly add my voice to this as a community member that I too am very concerned about this surprise turn of events. I had every expectation of the community being part of this process. If the county and Action Housing would include the community in these discussions, they might not be under the misinformation that you are standing alone on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
